Recent Updates Page 4 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • jzb 6:20 pm on March 6, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Apache CloudStack, CCC, , CloudStack, SCLs, Software Collections   

    Looking Forward to ApacheCon, CentOS Dojo Denver, and CloudStack Collaboration Conference in April 

    In just a bit more than a month, the mile-high city is going to play host to a triple-feature of open source IT goodness:

    Starting April 7th and running through the 11th, you’ll have a chance to connect with folks developing and deploying some of the most used infrastructure in the world. Apache Web server? Check. Apache Hadoop? Check. Lucene, Solr, Libcloud, Kafka, Cordova…? Check, check… well you get the idea. Also CentOS and Apache CloudStack.

    The schedule for each of these events is outstanding. Oh, and I managed to sneak in a few talks as well. I’ll be doing a talk at each:

    You really, really don’t want to miss this year’s ApacheCon, and stay for the Dojo and CloudStack Collab because they’re also going to be chock full of goodness. You can register for ApacheCon here, and register for the CentOS Dojo for just $50 through March 20 and add the CCC registration there as well. Or just register for the CentOS Dojo on April 10th separately if you can only make one day.

    Have questions about any of the events? Drop me a note by email or hit me up on Twitter, happy to try to help or find the right person.  Hope to see you in Denver!

  • jzb 4:51 pm on February 18, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: press, rant   

    Why PR Spam Makes Me Crazy… 

    It’s been nearly two years since I stopped working as press, yet I still get pitches almost daily from “pray and spray” PR folks – almost always about things that I wouldn’t have covered even if I was still doing my old beats.

    One of the reasons this makes me crazy is obvious: I don’t need more email to sort through. I get plenty of email to sort through as it is, I don’t need spam from PR folks who can’t be bothered to keep a decent list of press. What makes it worse is that they often will do the “just making sure you saw this” follow-up w/in 24 hours if I just hit delete. (Few things strike me as more entitled than PR folks who think they’re owed a response from a person they’ve never corresponded with before and they haven’t done their homework enough to know that you’re not even in their target demographic.)

    Aside from that, though, it makes me crazy because it’s a reminder just how lousy tech press has become in general. There’s no attempt to build relationships with tech press these days for the most part, because there’s damn little real journalism going on. The bulk of stories are reactionary – Acme Corp did Y today, so we’ll put up a 600-word post about it that only skims the surface and never revisit the topic again, unless it’s an outrage post of some sort that has a lifetime of a few days.

    It also makes me crazy because people get paid ridiculous amounts of money to… spam journalists. I’ve seen the rates offered by third-party firms that spam me, and they’re ridiculous when you take into account what they actually do. Companies should be paying PR people who have contacts in the industry, who know and understand the products they’re pitching, and know the publications.

    If you’re doing tech PR and you can’t name the current masthead of publications that are important to your client you have no business in the industry. If a person has left a publication and you still don’t know about it months later, you have no business being in the industry. Seriously, how can you be responsible for relationships with, say, ReadWriteWeb and not notice that someone’s posting frequency has gone from three times a day to zero for months? You’re clearly not paying attention to what they’re writing about, how can you possibly be effective in pitching them?

    Finally, it makes me crazy because one of the reasons the tech press sucks so much these days is there’s damn little money to pay people to do good coverage. And one of the reasons there’s damn little money is because it’s been diverted from advertising to ineffective social media and PR campaigns from over-priced firms that aren’t doing their damn job! So tech companies are basically shooting themselves in the foot, paying huge retainers to PR folks and skimping on supporting the publications that … they’re paying the ineffective PR firms to get coverage in. Then they’re surprised when they don’t seem to be getting good coverage. Sigh.

  • jzb 3:49 pm on January 25, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , F20, , , , ,   

    Brief Review: Seiki 4K 39″ TV/Monitor 

    Just a bit ago, I blogged about getting a 4K monitor working on Fedora 20. Now that I’ve had a bit of time with the monitor, I wanted to comment on the experience a little.

    Reviews on various sites really bagged on this monitor’s color/clarity compared to traditional computer monitors. While I don’t doubt discerning users might find flaws in this monitor, it’s just fine for my use case. That is, I spend the day using IRC, a few terminals, Web browser, PDF reader, mail client, and maybe LibreOffice.

    If I’m using any sort of image editing/photo editing software, it’s strictly for cropping and re-sizing. So, honestly, it doesn’t matter to me if things are perfectly color-calibrated or if it’s good for gaming.

    Compared to my 27″ Apple Cinema Display, I’d give it a B- or C+ for picture quality. But a small sacrifice of picture quality is well worth the extra desktop space.

    Daily Use

    The productivity increase I got from the 4K monitor was so great, I finish my work in half the time and have been promoted twice in the last week.

    Uh, OK… not really. But we geeks are always chasing that tiny productivity boost, or searching to zap annoyances in our work day – and I’m happy to say there has indeed been a productivity boost and some zapped annoyances.

    You can’t really quantify the improvement you get from a new setup like this, but if I had to… I’d say it’s 10%, maybe 15% more productive. I find myself spending less times tabbing through things, I can actually have four to six things open at the same time for a task without any need to tab through windows and find something. Example: Planning the Infrastructure.Next events, I can have a few emails or Web browsers open that have speakers’ abstracts, the Lanyrd page for Infrastructure.Next @ SCALE and Infrastructure.Next @ Ghent, a terminal for using middleman to update Red Hat’s Open Source Community blog, and still keep an eye on IRC/IM.


    The 39″ monitor is the same distance as the 27″ monitor, which admittedly is not the best layout ergonomically. The top and far right/left of the monitor are just high/far enough away that it’s slightly uncomfortable. I’d like to push the monitor back about another six to eight inches, but there’s not room on my desk.


    A few annoyances with the setup so far.

    First, the power management and Fedora don’t seem to get along. I had to turn off power management in KDE, because either Fedora was crashing, or the monitor wasn’t waking up again or taking a signal after KDE put the display to sleep.

    The monitor has a sleep feature that kicks in at a regular interval, and the option to turn it off is greyed out in its menu. So, every few hours I get a overlay display on the monitor telling me it’s going to sleep in 60 seconds. So I grab the remote, mash a button, and it stays awake. (Or if I’m not at the computer, I have to power it on again when I get back to the desk.)

    Not a huge deal, but also a bit annoying.

    It has a PC input for sound, but I haven’t found a way to select that input while also using HDMI, which is annoying.

    The only workable input to get the 4K resolution is HDMI. I’d like to use DisplayPort, but that’s not an option for this display. I’ve read a bit about “active” DisplayPort-to-HDMI adapters that might let me use the laptop DisplayPort successfully, and I’m going to try that soon.


    For my use, the positives outweigh the negatives, though I debate whether I should have waited for the Dell 4K monitors. Higher cost, but probably better quality and easier to set up.

    But, you get what you pay for. The Seiki is cheap and available now. It works well enough that I’m sure I’ll get quite a bit of use out of it. Worst case scenario, I could always use it as a TV if 4K ever really becomes a thing for Blu Ray/streaming video and replace it with a Dell or another proper 4K monitor when they become more available.

    If you spend all day at the computer, I’d strongly recommend checking it out.

  • jzb 7:26 pm on January 21, 2014 Permalink | Reply  

    Venue Change for London Cloud Summit 

    Just a bit over a week before the London Cloud Summit for 29 January, and we have a great line-up of speakers for the event.  One small housekeeping note, we’ve had a venue change from Shoreditchworks to The Bakery, which is here:

    View Larger Map

    If you haven’t signed up yet, there are a few seats left, so grab your ticket today:

    Full schedule on Lanyrd.

  • jzb 5:05 am on January 16, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    The 4K Desktop on Fedora 

    Seiki 4K on Fedora

    Seiki 4K on Fedora

    Like a lot of folks, I caught the “4K is for Programmers” post off Hacker News a few days ago (it’s here, but the link seems to be borked at the moment) and got to thinking about more desktop space. Much more.

    My current setup, when not traveling, involves a 27″ 2560×1440 display – usually connected to my laptop. Even with that, I found myself tabbing through windows too often balancing terminal windows, browser windows, and mail.

    Eventually I decided it was worth a shot, and ordered the Seiki 4K 39″ (SE39UY04) off Amazon. Unfortunately, didn’t seem to have much luck getting it going with my existing video card in the workstation or my laptop, so I wound up ordering a EVGA GeForce GTX760, and slapped that into the workstation.

    It takes a few steps to get it going at its full resolution on Fedora 20, at least with my setup:

    1. Install the nVidia drivers as explained in this F19 nVidia install/un-install guide.
    2. As shown in this forum post, add a line to /etc/X11/xorg.conf in the Device section with several options that are needed to pass the right resolution:Option "ModeValidation" "AllowNon60hzmodesDFPModes, NoEDIDDFPMaxSizeCheck, NoVertRefreshCheck, NoHorizSyncCheck, NoDFPNativeResolutionCheck, NoMaxSizeCheck, NoMaxPClkCheck, AllowNonEdidModes, NoEdidMaxPClkCheck"
    3. Add the file /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-monitor.conf, with this content:
      Section "Monitor"
        Identifier "Monitor0"
        Modeline "3840x2160" 307.00 3840 4016 4104 4400 2160 2168 2178 2250 +hsync +vsync
      Section "Screen"
        Identifier "Screen0"
        Device "HDMI-0"
        Option "ModeValidation" "AllowNon60hzmodesDFPModes, NoEDIDDFPMaxSizeCheck, NoVertRefreshCheck, NoHorizSyncCheck, NoDFPNativeResolutionCheck, NoMaxSizeCheck, NoMaxPClkCheck, AllowNonEdidModes, NoEdidMaxPClkCheck"
        Monitor "Monitor0"
        DefaultDepth 24
        SubSection "Display"
          Depth 24
          Modes "3840x2160" "1920x1080"

    And that’s really it. Once I logged out and back in, it automagically detected the highest resolution and set the monitor to it.

    Is the picture as nice as the 27″ Cinema Display? No. But it works fine, and after some tweaking (turn the Sharpness to 0, use the User preset) it’s a respectable picture.

    I also tested plugging in the 27″ display and the 39″ display at the same time… yep, they both work. So if I can clear enough space on the desk, I’ll have waaay too much desktop space to play with. It has four outputs: HDMI, DisplayPort, and two DVI. I may see if it can drive all four just for grins, though I can’t imagine using that setup all day.. or having space for it on my desktop.

    Given that the 4K post seemed to spark a lot of conversation, I do hope we’ll start seeing some focus on higher resolution monitors in the near future. We’ve been stuck for a few years with stagnant pricing on higher resolution displays (e.g. 2560×1440 displays) and not many options. Looking forward to working with the new biggie-sized desktop.

    • Adam Williamson 6:39 am on January 16, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      Eh, I’m not really feeling the TV-sized displays. I’m much more interested in replacing my 2x U2211s with 2x UP2414Qs:

      now *that’s* how to use 4k 😉 Just waiting for the price to drop a bit.

    • Alfred Poor 5:29 pm on January 16, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      4K is a lot of pixels, but it’s still cheaper to buy them in smaller chunks. Four 20-inch 1080p monitors will likely cost less than the single 4K panel, and leave enough to pay for a good 4-monitor stand. Plus you don’t have to worry about finding a graphics card (and interface) that can handle 4K at a suitable frame rate.

      • jzb 5:49 pm on January 16, 2014 Permalink | Reply

        That’s actually not the case. This monitor was ~$500.

    • birger 7:25 am on January 17, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      The new Lenovo 28″ 4K screen is $799 (possibly with touch screen?), and with built-in android it is $1199.

      Dell have a new 4K 28″ at $699

      Asus also have a new fast 28″ 4K at $799.

      I am currently running a Lenovo Ultra Wide 29″ monitor with 2560×1080 resolution. Hooked up to the mini-DP connector of my Lenovo X1 Carbon laptop Fedora 20 autodetects it and runs it at full resolution without any problem. Intel drivers on linux rock. I look forward to getting a 4K screen for testing. 🙂

      • jzb 4:01 pm on January 17, 2014 Permalink | Reply

        2560×1080? That’s unusual. I thought the standard there was 2560×1440.

        I have a 2560×1440 that works just fine with my Lenovo ThinkPad (T530) as well. There really is a difference with the 4K, though. Soooo much real estate!

    • Wolfgang Rupprecht 3:37 am on September 12, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      I was struggling with getting the 39″ 4k Seiki running with an AMD/ATI Radeon HD 6450. The best I could do was 15 hz with a cut down dot-clock in a custom config file similar to the above. Turns out the problem was related to the graphics card and an older display controller version in the HD 6450 chip. Upgrading to a Radeon HD 7770 fixed the problem. I now get 30 hz refresh with an absolutely stock Xorg config. (The lag at 15hz was driving me crazy. Typing quickly meant that I’d be a few chars ahead of what the display was showing me.)

      Love the display size. The resolution is 113 dpi, which is just about right for me.

  • jzb 4:16 pm on January 12, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , display, , ,   

    4K and Fedora? 

    Decided that mere 2560×1440 resolution was just not cutting it on the desktop, so I ordered a 39″ Seiki 4K monitor on Amazon. Should be arriving tomorrow. Wondering if anyone else in Fedoraland has set one of these puppies up, and if so – what video card and drivers you’re using?

    I have a Dell dual-Xeon workstation with a nVidia Quadro NVS 295. A bit of googling suggests that it might have trouble driving something with a resolution higher than 2560×1600. Any experience with this video card and Fedora would also be welcome!

    • Gary Scarborough 12:47 am on January 14, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      I just built a system with a Haswell i5 4670 and a Gigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H motherboard. The integrated graphics card will do 4096×2160 @24Hz on the HDMI port according to the manual

      • jzb 4:43 am on January 14, 2014 Permalink | Reply

        Have you tested it with Fedora and a 4K monitor?

        • Moochiek 6:16 pm on April 15, 2017 Permalink | Reply

          The Quadro NVS 295 runs at 4K on my Samsung 28″ UHD monitor via DisplayPort, driver version 11/14/2016 (Windows 10 update version).

  • jzb 7:18 pm on December 3, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Debian, , FOSDEM,   

    FOSDEM Distributions Developer Room: Call for Participation 

    FOSDEM LogoOnce again, FOSDEM will have a cross-distribution miniconference on 1 & 2 February 2014. We’d like to invite submissions of talks, Birds of a Feather (BoF) sessions, or round-table discussions from any interested representatives of Linux distributions or individuals who have a topic of interest related to Linux distributions.

    Proposals should be submitted through the FOSDEM proposal system (Pentabarf) here:

    You’ll add your session title, speaker bio, and abstract for the talk. If you’ve presented or submitted at FOSDEM previously, you should have an account in Pentabarf. If you haven’t created an account, but have presented at FOSDEM previously please contact me before creating an account – the odds are you have an account that was created previously by the FOSDEM organizers.

    Deadline for submissions is 22 December 2013. Since we’re on a tight timeline, this is unlikely to be extended.

    In addition to speakers, we also need one moderator for each day, and a video volunteer for each day. The moderator will introduce the speaker, keep time, and pass the microphone around for questions. The video volunteer will handle recording of sessions with provided equipment. (Don’t worry, we’ll also provide training as well.)

    The call for participation is going out a bit late, so please do speak up quickly if you’re interested in participating! Also, please do help spread the word so we can ensure the best possible program for this year’s FOSDEM.

  • jzb 3:25 pm on November 14, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Amazon, , re:Invent   

    First Impressions at AWS re:Invent 

    Last year I attended AWS re:Invent, kinda, sorta. We were in Las Vegas to put on the first Apache CloudStack conference and most of my time and brainpower were consumed with last-minute planning for that event. I did spend time in the developer area, on exhibit floor, and some of the after-parties – but it wasn’t a usual conference for me.

    This year, I’m actually not consumed with pre-conference planning (though the CloudStack Collaboration Conference is happening next week in Amsterdam, and I’m sad I won’t be able to attend), so I’ve been paying attention to re:Invent.

    Generally, I tend to attend more community/FOSS and techie shows than big vendor blow-outs like AWS re:Invent. The very scale of the event is really impressive, and I have to give Amazon kudos for the slickness of the presentations and how smoothly the event is running. The registration, for instance, was totally slammed on day one – yet they kept the lines moving really well and even had a DJ (!) playing tunes in the corner to make the wait a little better.

    The content on the other hand… well, it’s a bit generic and the keynote yesterday was definitely not what I was hoping for or expecting. First, I was surprised and disappointed at the amount of time Amazon spent calling out competitors (IBM, for an admittedly silly marketing stunt) and dissing private cloud. Does Amazon offer a solution that’s really appealing for certain applications or certain types of companies? Yup. Is public cloud ever going to be the majority of the compute market? I’m not convinced.

    The keynote yesterday felt like a plea to enterprise, and way too much preaching to the converted and marketing fluff that we already knew anyway. Yeah, we get it: AWS is big, lots of customers (oooh, pretty NASCAR slides) and so forth. At least they did announce a few new services during the keynote, so attendees got a little excitement.

    For me, the biggest part of any event is the “hallway track.” On one hand, it’s pretty good here because there’s about 9,000 people – you can easily find interesting people who are doing fun stuff with AWS and other tech, so that’s been good.

    The bad, really bad, is the conference scheduling site is terrible and there’s no attendee directory whatsoever. I was doubly disappointed when I looked on Lanyrd and found only about 40 people signed up. It would have been great if I could have searched a directory (opt-in, of course) to try to connect with people ahead of time to meet and talk about their cloud usage.

    Maybe next year. Overall, I think re:Invent is worth the time, money, and trip if you’re using AWS or are trying to disrupt AWS – but there are a number of things Amazon could do to make the conference more friendly for attendees and partners.

  • jzb 4:39 pm on November 4, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Apple, , iOS, OS X   

    Apple’s “Pathological” Approach to Customers 

    I think Lawrence Lessig puts his finger on it pretty well with this post about the problems with Apple’s “communication” strategy about bugs/feature removal in upgrades:

    But the argument I want to advance here is different. It is that in the “hybrid economy” that the Internet is, there is an ethical obligation to treat users decently. “Decency” of course is complex, and multi-faceted. But the single dimension I want to talk about here is this: They must learn to talk to us. In the face of the slew of either bugs or “features” (because as you’ll see, it’s unclear in some cases whether Apple considers the change a problem at all), a decent company would at least acknowledge to the public the problems it identifies as problems, and indicate that they are working to fix it.

    Why is that what decency requires? And why, then, is the pathologically constipated way in which Apple communicates with its customers indecent?

    Because when you see the incredible effort that is being devoted to dealing with these either bugs or features, there is an obvious incredible waste of time and resources that Apple could avoid simply by saying what they know.

    For many users, communication is one of the strongest arguments for open source.

    The fact that the source is open may not make a lick of difference to people who aren’t good with code, and/or are uninterested in spending the time to maintain or add features, or fix bugs. But they can have a direct line of communication with the developers who are working on features. Maybe a project you’re using goes in a direction you don’t like (for example) but at least you see the “WONTFIX” in the bug tracker. With Apple? Who the heck knows?

    Many of the freedoms that are important to open source/free software folks seem like abstractions to non-developers. Apple provides a really good object lesson that shows that there are concrete reasons, beyond just hacking the code, that users should prefer open source.

compose new post
next post/next comment
previous post/previous comment
show/hide comments
go to top
go to login
show/hide help
shift + esc